Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #138371
| From | bje@ripco.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Little Snitch? |
| Date | 2022-01-04 12:28 +0000 |
| Organization | Ripco Communications Inc. |
| Message-ID | <sr1egl$fvb$1@remote6hme0.ripco.com> (permalink) |
| References | <sr0s85$rbr$1@dont-email.me> |
gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote: > While trying to address some issues that involved ceaseless demands for > logins, I started trying to unload some 3rd party stuff. One of the ones I > unloaded was Little Snitch which I had used for years. I don't think it was > responsible for my issues, which were eventually addressed, but I can't be > positive, since it was in fact removed. > > Nonetheless, I'm curious if others make consistent use of Little Snitch. > One of the main reasons I wanted to adopt it was to keep Adobe, Microsoft > and Google's constant updating and snooping activity under control. I > eventually managed to get rid of all their applications and utilities, but > held on to Little Snitch and at least *thought* it was keeping malevolent > forces at bay. Not really sure what you are asking. I've been using Little Snitch on a mac that has a real ipv4 address and is running 24x7. I can't really see how not to use it. It constantly gets banged on (mostly sshd via launchd). If you are on a NAT address and are only worried about things from your mac going outbound and somewhat solved the issues, suppose there is no harm getting rid of it but it doesn't get in the way of anything, so why not keep it? I've been using it for years and can't remember it causing any problems. -bruce bje@ripco.com
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Little Snitch? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2022-01-04 07:16 +0000 Re: Little Snitch? bje@ripco.com - 2022-01-04 12:28 +0000 Re: Little Snitch? Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2022-01-04 07:56 -0500
csiph-web