Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.dont-email.me!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lewis Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Apple Silicon M1 Chip in MacBook Air Outperforms High-End 16-Inch MacBook Pro and All iOS Devices Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:09:23 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Miskatonic U Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: g.kreme@gmail.don-t-email-me.com Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:09:23 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: kreme.dont-email.me; posting-host="a4148fe67ba4472862bf41e40a473e5c"; logging-data="11947"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yBuslvuX4LKMpD42Uif/H" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HsEr9DoOHOa7hcKXQRmxOe6q8Bw= X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Mail-Copies-To: nobody Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:135023 In message JF Mezei wrote: > On 2020-11-17 17:18, Stephen Hoffman wrote: >> If by "basically invisible" you mean "a whole lot of work, and very >> much a substantial effort for many developers", sure. > From the user point of view, the Mac transitions did not expose the user > to system memoriry management changes. > This is in the context of the RAM limitations of the new Macs. Someone > argues that moving from x86 to ARM would require less memory, a premise > I disagree with. (they said an 8GB M1 Mac would be just as capable as a > 16GB Intel one). They were, as it turns out, wrong. The 8GB M1 is MORE capable than the 16GB Intel. No one predicted that. -- You can find any pattern you want to any level of precision you want If you ignore enough data.