Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.dont-email.me!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lewis Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Mac OS 11 - end of OS for my iMac... Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:03:21 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Miskatonic U Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <171120201240455000%nospam@nospam.invalid> Reply-To: g.kreme@gmail.don-t-email-me.com Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:03:21 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: kreme.dont-email.me; posting-host="e78d61087fb7173c7f638480600ef494"; logging-data="3561"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+zToHBDp1TekWsV2Fzm4le" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wqs3GfZvbfWC4TaIfphI38+w+u4= X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Mail-Copies-To: nobody Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:134988 In message <171120201240455000%nospam@nospam.invalid> nospam wrote: > In article , Alan Browne- > wrote: >> >> I don't like the fixed memory option though - I liked that I could >> purchase the iMac with min mem and then order upgrades at much lower >> cost from crucial or the other guys. My next iMac will be at least 32 >> GB if not 64 (assuming that's offered - I wouldn't be shocked to see >> 128). I'd be delighted if there is user upgradeable memory but I'm >> certainly not expecting it. > there likely will be in higher end models. I do not expect to see Mac with upgradable RAM. Maybe the Mac Pro/iMac Pro (if the iMac Pro continues to exist). The advantages to having the RAM on the SoC are too great. > this is the *beginning* of the transition, not the end. People seem to be forgetting this. I will be very interested in the next round of machines. -- Oh! I thought they smelled bad on the *outside*!