Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.alt.net
From: "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject: Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:48:01 +0100
Organization: ~
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <op.yy4e2btwjs98qf@red.lan>
References: <201703291311387217-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <D50FCE29.9DF6F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ocdvf8$joa$6@dont-email.me> <D50FD22A.9DFA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me> <D50FD39A.9DFB8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oce0kv$joa$12@dont-email.me> <D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <D5100ABE.9E09D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ocegol$hr9$1@dont-email.me> <D51017D6.9E126%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ocehta$hr9$2@dont-email.me> <D5101F85.9E13C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyqrhfimjs98qf@red.lan> <octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me> <D517A3C8.9F246%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me> <D517E975.9F304%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy381xf2js98qf@red.lan> <D5212D87.A0DA3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:410652 sci.physics:630164 alt.privacy.anon-server:59107 comp.sys.mac.system:105018 alt.comp.os.windows-10:40473 alt.cellular-phone-tech:1326

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 23:55:51 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/22/17, 2:38 PM, in article op.yy381xf2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:15:01 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/15/17, 11:16 AM, in article octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending of
>>>>>> other people's money.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quote?
>>>>
>>>> Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then that
>>>> is an entirely correct statement.
>>>> Get a child to read for you in the future.
>>>
>>> So no quote to back your claims of my views. Got it. You are just trolling
>>> for attention.
>>>
>>> Keep in mind I am the one who pushes for a STRONGER tie between hard work /
>>> productivity and financial gain.
>>
>> That's called "capitalism".
>
> Capitalism, without checks, is the selling of human rights and the
> environment to the highest bidder and directly works AGAINST those goals.
> With that said, pure Socialism would be no better. Having a mix of the two
> is not perfect but works far better than either, alone.

Human rights gets in the way of progress.  Bring back the slaves and let us prosper.  By the way, are you an ethnic minority?  Because you're sure acting like one.

-- 
Gargoyle (n), olive-flavored mouthwash.