Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net From: "James Wilkinson Sword" Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.cellular-phone-tech Subject: Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:48:40 +0100 Organization: ~ Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <7699542da7f01f1304183cf9c297a669@dizum.com> <110420171637461709%nospam@nospam.invalid> <2017041115581186676-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <110420172052399287%nospam@nospam.invalid> <150420171445165078%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420171936532866%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420172017550597%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420172054342549%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420172149491457%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:410531 comp.sys.mac.system:104917 alt.comp.os.windows-10:40396 alt.cellular-phone-tech:1275 On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:49:49 +0100, nospam wrote: > In article , James Wilkinson Sword > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> I can print vivid red on my printer. I often do for bright text. >> >> > >> >> > not as vivid as can be displayed on screen and nowhere near as vivid as >> >> > your eye can see. >> >> >> >> Depends on the lighting in the room. >> > >> > no. >> >> You think the ambient light doesn't affect the colour on the paper?! > > inks can't reproduce highly saturated reds, among other colours, and no > amount of unique lighting can change that. Saturated colours are easy, just look how deep the colour is in a bottle of ink. -- If sex is a pain in the ass, then you're doing it wrong.