Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net From: "James Wilkinson Sword" Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.cellular-phone-tech Subject: Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:11:28 +0100 Organization: ~ Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: <7699542da7f01f1304183cf9c297a669@dizum.com> <2017041114434712366-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2017041115295799247-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2017041115501412991-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <201704111720307730-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <150420171445165045%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420171013465413%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420171032312950%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420171040573298%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210420171104408672%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:410280 comp.sys.mac.system:104792 alt.comp.os.windows-10:40282 alt.cellular-phone-tech:1216 On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:04:40 +0100, nospam wrote= : > In article , James Wilkinson Sword > wrote: > >> > >> >> Don't ever get a Fuji digital camera, they LIE about the MP. >> > >> > no they don't. >> >> Oh they do. I have a compact digital from them which claims 10MP. I= t's easy >> to see it's only a quarter of that when you zoom in in Photoshop. Th= ey use >> software interpolation inside the camera, the CCD is not 10MP. It's = a >> Finepix S1000FD if you want to check. > > that's a 10 mp camera, creating photos with 3648 x 2736 pixels. > > x_s1000fd/> So it says. Now find some output from one and zoom in. >> > the only company that lies about the number of megapixels is sigma.= >> >> Only ever used their lenses, which are good. > > not really. > > sigma makes cheaper lenses for those who don't want to pay the premium= > for nikon/canon lenses. you mostly get what you pay for. their quality= > control is awful. many times you have to go through several copies to > get a lens that isn't defective in one way or another. a common flaw i= s > off-centered elements, which results in one side of the image being > sharper than the other. I had a "Bigma" (50-500mm Canon fit lens) which worked perfectly for yea= rs until I sold it second hand. I wouldn't say it was cheap. =A33000 for it, a 15-30mm (can't remember = if that was Canon or Sigma), and a Canon EOS10D. > tokina and tamron are decent third party options, but the best choice > is usually the camera maker's own lenses (there are the occasional > exceptions). I think at the time Canon didn't have anything with the specs of the Big= ma. -- = I'm not an atheist. How can you not believe in something that doesn't e= xist? -- Whitney Brown