Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net
From: "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject: Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:35:00 +0100
Organization: ~
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan>
References: <7699542da7f01f1304183cf9c297a669@dizum.com> <op.yyh3eij8js98qf@red.lan> <100420171849497710%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yyh7mis3js98qf@red.lan> <100420172009002755%nospam@nospam.invalid> <aNaHA.556$K_5.443@fx42.iad> <op.yyju1onljs98qf@red.lan> <2017041114434712366-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyjw18bqjs98qf@red.lan> <2017041115295799247-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyjybkeajs98qf@red.lan> <2017041115501412991-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyj2hlsajs98qf@red.lan> <201704111720307730-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyq0lri0js98qf@red.lan> <150420171445165045%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1nocmojs98qf@red.lan> <210420171013465413%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1t5dmejs98qf@red.lan> <210420171032312950%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:410263 comp.sys.mac.system:104786 alt.comp.os.windows-10:40274 alt.cellular-phone-tech:1210

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:32:31 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <op.yy1t5dmejs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword
> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> > As for making prints look just like those from a 35mm camera, that
>> >> >> > sort of degradation is easily done with software.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I take it you didn't have a professional SLR 35mm camera.
>> >> >
>> >> > film is worse than digital in every metric.
>> >> >
>> >> > digital can be downgraded to look like film if the user wants, but that
>> >> > would be stupid if quality is the goal.
>> >>
>> >> Decent film is as good as digital.
>> >
>> > definitely not.
>> >
>> >> I mean professional quality low ASA
>> >> film on a camera with a good lens.
>> >
>> > doesn't matter.
>>
>> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time.
>
> digital has been better than film for well over a decade.

I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP.

Don't ever get a Fuji digital camera, they LIE about the MP.  Canon gives you what it says on the tin.

-- 
Barry bit Ben's bum before Betty bumfingered big Bertha's buttocks beside Brian's burning bonfire. -- Ronnie Tompkins, circa 2014.