Path: csiph.com!xmission!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: USB Extension Cable Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <1n3ycci.6uq60d1lkj2dfN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <58e323ef$0$10178$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com> <1n43y1s.1gtrkvg1x6sk2sN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <070420171402098699%nospam@nospam.invalid> <070420172158092362%nospam@nospam.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1491670091 21115 192.74.137.71 (8 Apr 2017 16:48:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:103769 nospam writes: >In article , Michael Moroney > wrote: >> And, I didn't see this before, but they make the same outlandish claims on >> the package that Monster is (in)famous for. Transfer your data at 800 MHz! >> (not the 480 MHz "ordinary" USB cables are limited to!) >does it actually say mhz?? >because usb 2 is 480 mbit/s, and the limitation is not from the cable, >but usb itself. Sorry, it does say 800 Mbps, not MHz.