Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Baker Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: OT: "Every American"... Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:40:07 -0800 Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de Message-ID: References: <040220171111192098%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040220171237081072%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040220171706461759%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040220172000548677%nospam@nospam.invalid> <58976b15$0$28843$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com> <050220171514487632%nospam@nospam.invalid> <070220172103456968%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ElYTkUFFDarf/bMPOgbS5Zhi4cXc1znCLRzfMXvroA/JQHSxBFn7+5rgZOi141xsfrUd1nMDTNI= Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.datemas.de; logging-data="23817"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@datemas.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 In-Reply-To: <070220172103456968%nospam@nospam.invalid> Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:99821 On 2017-02-07 6:03 PM, nospam wrote: > In article , FPP wrote: > >>>>> "extreme carelessness" with classified information would have put me >>>>> behind bars rather quickly when I was in the Navy or during my twenty >>>>> years as a defense contractor. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, it would have gotten you fired. As long as no breach was detected, >>>> your handing of the data is incompetence, not crime. >>> >>> multiple security breaches *were* detected, including classified email >>> which went through her email server in her basement. >> >> This is pretty damned simple, really. You only need to listen to what >> the Republican Director of the FBI told Homeland Security. > > what for? he's lied under oath too. they're all kissing each others > asses. Quote, please... > > the *only* person to listen to with regard to what hillary has done is > hillary herself. > >>> "We don't have direct evidence the server was successfully hacked. We >>> wouldn't expect to see, though, that evidence from sophisticated >>> adversaries given the nature of the adversary and given the nature of >>> the system," Comey told a panel of the House Homeland Security >>> Committee. >> >> You've presented ZERO credible evidence otherwise. You either can >> prove it, or you're lying. > > listen to what *she* has said. very simple. nobody else. >