Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Baker Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: OT: "Every American"... Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:39:43 -0800 Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de Message-ID: References: <040220171111192098%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040220171237081072%nospam@nospam.invalid> <070220172103426766%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ElYTkUFFDarf/bMPOgbS5Zhi4cXc1znCLRzfMXvroA/JQHSxBFn7+5rgZOi141xsfrUd1nMDTNI= Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.datemas.de; logging-data="23817"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@datemas.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 In-Reply-To: <070220172103426766%nospam@nospam.invalid> Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:99820 On 2017-02-07 6:03 PM, nospam wrote: > In article , Fred Moore > wrote: > > >> You _must_ agree that if there were _any_ hard evidence that Hilary had >> lied under oath, the Congressional Reactionaries would have INSISTED she >> be prosecuted, and they could indeed have made a prosecution happen. But >> they didn't because they couldn't because there was no hard evidence, >> just wishful thinking and smokescreen propaganda. Remember, they have >> been after her ever since Bill was sworn in and they lambasted her for >> an inadequate chocolate chip cookie recipe (just to put into perspective >> how absurd their fetish with persecuting her is). > > there's plenty of evidence, it's that there was a *lot* of pressure to > not pursue anything. > >> As to the email server, she admitted to that and that it was a mistake. > > mistakes involve penalties. so far, all that's happened is a slap on > the wrist. > > if you were arrested and told the cop you made a mistake, what do you > think will happen? do you think they'll say 'don't do it again' and let > you go home?? Depending on the mistake? Yes. > > she plays by a different set of rules because she's rich and has > connections. > >> But how did she happen to come to do it? Colin Powell, a former >> **REPUBLICAN** Secretary of State told her to! But, oh no, that part >> never gets mentioned does it? (Of course, Colin Powell is a war criminal >> because he was crucial to foisting the Iraq war crime on the American >> public with his blatant lies, but perhaps that won't damage his >> credibility. Oh, THAT'S IT! The email server business was a setup from >> the beginning just to bring Hilary down! Those Reactionaries are VERY >> devious.) > > that just means he's also involved. >