Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp151@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: OT: "Every American"...
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:36:53 -0500
Organization: Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <o7bbor$7jl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <efkvkmF2eu1U1@mid.individual.net> <o744vt$ih5$1@dont-email.me> <040220171111192098%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o7531b$nue$1@dont-email.me> <040220171237081072%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040220171706461759%nospam@nospam.invalid> <040220172000548677%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o771fi$52d$1@dont-email.me> <050220171514537945%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9320ab4ba6a586a260ea48aaea12301a"; logging-data="7797"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AN0FhDjG+Z/RE0sSpFWzT"
User-Agent: Unison/1.8.1
X-Face: $S(1)nD`-E<*bgHp{U3PkEIRK8)#hgSr&jBr)+JRi#,w{fEJJ`mVW_<'}`^z[h6Hm(ewhj<
 `|P!wJ9'\zqYmj0?a3F}DO_7#0'O#l+hE,+Z6@l9>c`(Jr.!Af\<xCn8oxTE'DXvx,Q8)*Kf($<u0q
 ]>9XS_ln2I!V#Y^;UO's/#S2F:8:q2E?D`v&']"F90(j+3a$f3^42B(0El|MJ_l6"_GDD<\?ccjUYa
 0SJ]PajZR:T<e$S<pj^gXo
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qleguABW+iF8dlnK+O60kB9lRno=
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:99720

On 2017-02-05 15:14:53 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said:

> In article <o771fi$52d$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> her statements under oath are as factual as it gets.
>>>> 
>>>> And which of those statements factually supports your allegation that
>>>> she "paid off" an FBI director?
>>> 
>>> why else would he not prosecute someone who broke the law?
>> 
>> He told you.  No reasonable prosecutor would have brought such a weak
>> case to court.
> 
> that is itself a lie.
> 
> plenty of prosecutors would have brought it to court, many of whom
> wondered wtf he was talking about.
> 
>> What "law" are you referencing?  Law statutes have numbers... quote the
>> statute where she broke the law.
> 
> perjury, setting up a mail server in a basement that handles classified
> email. what cave have you been in?
> 
>> Do you actually have ANY proof of your assertions?  Anything that even
>> *resembles* proof?  No?
> 
> the proof is out there.

Bullshit is all you've presented.

Name the perjury.  You haven't and you won't.
Name the statute that was violated.  You haven't and you won't.
Name your "proof".  You haven't and you won't.

Give us a single shred of evidence backing anything you're saying?

Guess what?  You haven't and you won't.
-- 
REP. JOHN DUNCAN (R): "Do you understand that great numbers of people 
feel, now, that there's one standard of justice for the Clintons and 
another for regular people?"

COMEY:  "Yeah, I've heard that a lot... it's NOT TRUE, but I've heard 
it a lot."