Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: dgb (David) Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system,uk.comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Mac Malware Date: 9 Mar 2024 14:01:24 GMT Lines: 56 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net oUysqkSXtpMGb8hYO4Vy6gyJeikhTpEKXq8Wo0puimrywBPdV0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:82yTJgbAviWNwP+hHEQefuGiXF0= sha256:gqSpsPORCF2burot8Hxir5ethZ2nzaS6YsDfsOAhgx0= User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS X-Usenapp: v1.27.2/l - Full License Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.misc:9141 comp.sys.mac.system:143567 uk.comp.sys.mac:176663 On 9 Mar 2024 at 13:17:39 GMT, "Andy H" wrote: > On 09/03/2024 10:11, dgb (David) wrote: >> On 9 Mar 2024 at 09:16:56 GMT, "John Hill" wrote: >> >>> On 9 Mar 2024 at 08:58:08 GMT, "dgb" wrote: >>> >>>> I'm not the only person to talk about it! See ..... >>> >>> Oh, NO! Not again!! >>> >>> Serenity required. >> >> How sad, Old John. ;-( >> >> //Closed-minded people put their ego ahead of the outcome. They refrain from >> inquiring and instead focus on disproving others without attempting to >> comprehend their perspectives. They tend to become frustrated when questioned >> and perceive those who seek clarification as hindrances to progress. They tend >> to easily get angered with people who disagree.// >> >> https://fs.blog/open-closed-minded/ > > Just one response from me, to all of your postings on this matter. > Sometimes a comment just sparks something in me to react. > > As I see it the kind of posts you (and similar others) write here, and > in other places have been a contributory factor in the demise of Usenet, > and making groups, such as this, awful places for anyone to discuss the > subjects of their titles. > > The persistence of your posted subject matter just seems to indicate > that you are insane (and perhaps so am I for even considering a response). > > It may be misquoted from Einstein (perhaps, I can't be arsed to really > look that deeply, nevertheless, I trust Einstein more than anyone's > 'information' here). > > 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and > expecting different results'. > > The only thing that could be added to that is 'ad nauseum'. > > Where I stand on the security and privacy of my devices has bugger all > to do with you, or anyone else. I know about it, and I understand it, > but it's not answerable to you, or anyone else. I'm certainly not > 'closed-minded' about it all, just because I don't want to talk about it > with some guy on the Internet. > > Cheers. It seems as if I've touched a nerve! ;-) You saw the answer I gave to Mark - why didn't you simply agree with me? Cheers!