Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: 4.8GB iNode file in Lost+Found
Date: 21 May 2017 01:46:41 GMT
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <eoc9s0Fgp76U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ofo4r8$t6k$1@dont-email.me> <eo9oukFt63cU1@mid.individual.net> <ofogcj$leu$1@dont-email.me> <eob8gkF8r1qU1@mid.individual.net> <ofpu20$vdk$1@dont-email.me> <eobds9FakluU1@mid.individual.net> <ofqd5p$gan$1@dont-email.me> <eoc0taFerh0U1@mid.individual.net> <5920d8f2$0$53049$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net CPvq77tZuEiVjIdUW6z3FwQZx5+cL7S7XR4qIpyitIzSDFYkYO
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KzkQvUkLJbnncCo0HEDWntBGc90= sha1:5DvwlkRDV3zxV+cPt2PIoRfGcCc=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.2.6 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:107093

JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> Question:
> 
> Under what circumstances/process would a file be recreated without its
> original name?

Nobody said anything about recreating files without their original names.

> Does this imply that the catalogue record was zapped

Do your own research. Knock yourself out:

<http://bfy.tw/BuZm>

[aimless ramblings ignored]

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR