Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel...
Date: 27 Apr 2017 18:19:11 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <emer0vFd5veU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <2017042619201161432-gavin.lawrie@2gc.eu> <590104a9$0$36059$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> <slrnog3fbe.jnv.g.kreme@snow.local> <59022ff3$0$22780$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com>
X-Trace: individual.net gPPoBT6G3Lyc6LKlsCtgTg8rykDQG0cfQydxR/mFNt/Pd8Hf2P
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pgvwf88QLJ7RDx5XRHaIgaFFer4=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:117466 comp.sys.mac.system:105649

On 2017-04-27, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 2017-04-27 05:41, Lewis wrote:
>
>> No, it is nothing at all like RAID 1. Nothing. At all.
> Sorry,  Raid 0.
>
> Often forget the numbers for bound sets and mirroring. Fusion is bound
> volume so yeah, Raid 0.

Nope. You really have no idea what Core Storage is about, do you?

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR