Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: New file system ?
Date: 5 Mar 2017 02:34:55 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <ei1bqfFekesU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <58ba760d$0$55211$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <1n2dsh0.v7mdb3v7zzldN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <58bb0800$0$1231$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> <slrnobmoj5.llb.g.kreme@snow.local> <040320171959431469%nospam@nospam.invalid>
X-Trace: individual.net VxT3QlockoGQ8svXwCq5/ANu2qobyuw1ZwWTI9BYddp3xD7cEJ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:r5/kbeq7Ad2ZpJ+wL59x2e0QC88=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:101822

On 2017-03-05, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article <slrnobmoj5.llb.g.kreme@snow.local>, Lewis
><g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>
>> > From a general release point of view, can Apple enable GUI formatting of
>> > additional drives as HPFS if Time Machine doesn't yet work for it?
>> 
>> What the fuck are you talking about? That statement is utter nonesense.
>> 
>> > And if Time machine and other disk utilities work for HPFS, is there a
>> > reason to still delay the system drive conversion to HPFS?
>> 
>> What the fuck is HPFS?
>
> he obviously meant apfs

Not so obvious, no. He started out the same message spelling APFS
correctly, and then after smearing a little FUD, changed to using HPFS
for the entire rest of the very same message.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR