Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Ping: Jolly Roger Date: 25 Feb 2017 18:13:38 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net YkHD2VXi01naxDBPdLURMw4tzlO3Kkjo3PhcKCyRbjUmtT9/Nz Cancel-Lock: sha1:HIwYKNj825bbJTTMWaJWqMgXtYo= Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:101164 On 2017-02-25, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2017-02-25 10:45, Jolly Roger wrote: >> Wade Garrett wrote: >>> On 2/25/17 9:47 AM, Lewis wrote: >>>> In message David B. >>>> wrote: >>>>> I captured one such when Thunderbird stopped working properly this >>>>> morning. With my new-found knowledge (gained from you!) I've pasted same >>>>> here:- http://pastebin.com/wmThPuQ5 >>>> >>>> Ugh. Hang reports are problematic. However, Thunderbird is a crash-happy >>>> load of garbage in my experience, so crashing is "expected behavior" >>>> >>>> You say it crashed, but the report doesn't indicate a crash. >>>> >>> >>> Been using T'bird on usenet for years. Can't recall even a single crash... >> >> And how many times has it become unresponsive? > > I can't recall that happening either. To be sure over the past many > years I only use T'bird for usenet - but in prior years used it for mail > as well. Rarely (ever?) crashed and was (always?) responsive. > >> Either way, that you haven't experienced it does not mean it cannot happen. >> ; ) > > Certainly - but that may be due to especial issues of a given user or > config. Absolutely. Never said any different. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR