Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Preparing for losing Rosetta Date: 13 Feb 2017 22:25:14 GMT Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net WwSEku3yopA+envRG58hrQWbB8p4uXdo5sysmMXyHSuYhrxs4v Cancel-Lock: sha1:wro8RChRhEeJVp0J+0bPTMzhIuU= sha1:ISNFEn/Nz/G9DIamlBwo0Cfgios= User-Agent: NewsTap/5.2.2 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:100311 Patty Winter wrote: > > In article , > Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2017-02-13, Patty Winter wrote: >>> >>> I just looked at the test conversion I did with Eudora Mail Cleaner >>> a couple of years ago. The Outgoing folder has no attachments. That >>> makes sense, because Eudora grabs the attachment on the fly as it >>> sends the mail; it doesn't store a copy of the attachment anywhere. >>> >>> Incoming messages have paper-clip images in the summary window, but >>> when I look at an individual message, it says "missing attachment." >> >> That's very undesirable. A good e-mail client will preserve the entire >> message, including all parts (plain text, rich text, attachments, etc). > > JR, you apparently didn't notice that I was talking about a problem > that occurred when I ran *Eudora Mailbox Cleaner*, a completely separate > program from Eudora that was created by a Eudora user some years ago, not > by Qualcomm. Eudora knows exactly where those attachments are and displays > them just fine. > > You also clipped the rest of my message where I explained why that > probably happened. I don't think EMC was at fault, either, because > I use a *nonstandard* folder for incoming attachments. That's why I > asked whether anyone had done the conversion with the proper folder > structure and found that to work okay. I'm guessing that if I move > the attachments where Eudora Mailbox Cleaner expects to find them, > all will be well. > > I'm not going to claim that Eudora is perfect, but there's no reason > to criticize it in this situation. If Eudora had kept the original unmodified message, there would be no need for Eudora Mailbox Cleaner. Keep in mind it is Eudora that mangled the messages in the first place. In their default original state, messages contain all parts (plain text, rich text, attachments, and headers) as a monolithic block of text. That's what gets sent to the server and then received by e-mail clients. A well-behaved client will store incoming and outgoing messages in their original unmodified form (all message parts are included in the message, nothing is modified) which is how Apple Mail and other more modern clients behave. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR