Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: I'd Like to See a MacBook Pro Poll Date: 17 Nov 2016 16:42:17 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <281020161134443699%star@sky.net> <281020161153153970%nospam@nospam.invalid> <2016102810083321153-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <281020161323500072%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5813a140$0$63123$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> <5813ad89$0$18119$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> <281020161623367306%nospam@nospam.invalid> <061120160634581302%nospam@nospam.invalid> <071120161208303491%nospam@nospam.invalid> <151120161319151277%nospam@nospam.invalid> <151120161550024103%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net K18JFfaN6YeiLlH+nx2NbgAEETbTlZ3lES3vbkqlMXjTNgogQB Cancel-Lock: sha1:GnWwPWgTvnqSmCYo8Zdccf+vp0w= Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:96998 On 2016-11-17, dorayme wrote: > In article <151120161550024103%nospam@nospam.invalid>, > nospam wrote: > >> you have that backwards. with digital, there's no fuss. > > I had it completely the right way around in the context. You would > often not even easily get the idea of some things to do in digital > without having done them in wet. Another point you will not understand. While that may be true for technical noobs who never bother to simply explore menus and other user interface features in applications (or to read the included documentation), for people who aren't technophobes, discovering digital effects in apps - especially on mobile devices) is both faster and *far* less trouble than it would be to develop their own film in a darkroom. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR