Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Date: 13 Oct 2015 22:20:57 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <86549329f10d815d2e5922dee68cf94a@anemone.mooo.com> <210920151849448520%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020151828504734%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020151852561506%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020151911207774%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020152005503949%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020152029590863%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5612928c$0$49041$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> <9ridnYiFF7652oDLnZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net tKdMX5Z/6c54ktX4Hc+cwQ+56aR11HuCKY/bq+F/0skCXrrlJB Cancel-Lock: sha1:mIIuoJ1RsQH6ZzGVMkHOnIT9g1s= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.freeware:246384 comp.sys.mac.system:83395 comp.os.linux.advocacy:326502 On 2015-10-13, GreyCloud wrote: > On 10/13/15 12:36, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2015-10-13, GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>> There is no such thing as an "Expert". These people are experienced >>> in their niche field, but are never experts. Even medical doctors are >>> not experts, otherwise they'd be able to cure everybody. Some medical >>> doctors are better at it than others. >> >> The widely accepted definition of "expert" disagrees: >> >> "expert |ˈekˌspərt| >> noun >> a person who has a comprehensive and authoritative knowledge of or skill >> in a particular area: experts in child development | a financial expert." >> >> So according to the dictionary, a person can be an expert in a >> particular area or niche. >> > I figured you'd do that, so show me someone with a resume that has the > word expert on it. Usually, the word is used in high regard for someone > else. I don't see the point of this conversation. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR