Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Improved memory management? (10.11) Date: 11 Oct 2015 21:01:12 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <561aadff$0$4073$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> <2POdnQV2KJvyX4fLnZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> X-Trace: individual.net gLb7LHikU5Eje9nl27LZ7gdH/FQBISQSbg1O/wlpAQ2v1/N7HU Cancel-Lock: sha1:3IRw6eaKSI+x3m7Gtwv32VbtgMI= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:83102 On 2015-10-11, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2015-10-11 16:21, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2015-10-11, Alan Browne wrote: >>> On 2015-10-11 15:51, Jolly Roger wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-11, Alan Browne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 2. As I've mentioned in the past I've operated OS X with both swap and >>>>> compression disabled to no ill effect. >>>> >>>> What effects were there? >>> >>> The system worked fine, which is an acceptable effect. >> >> Was the system working fine before you disabled swap and compression? > > Yep. I was under the impression there was a measurable improvement. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR