Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Improved memory management? (10.11) Date: 8 Oct 2015 00:25:33 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net w5ArbBt2dzLXT9DBCbB/Bw42ZJ7T4D/NbZkHqJLn/Cn46j1cxw Cancel-Lock: sha1:hHyVWUvhFkcxzu5U5M/irHrOB4g= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:82439 On 2015-10-07, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2015-10-07 13:59, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2015-10-07, Alan Browne wrote: >>> After a few days of use since boot: >>> >>> - no swap used at all (there'd usually be at least a little) >>> >>> - compression is 0. >>> >>> I wonder if Apple have improved the memory management for 10.11 ...? >> >> The release notes might say - wouldn't surprise me either way. > > What's your reading (assuming you've 10.11'd a box)? I'm holding off at the moment. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR