Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: And Snit = Michael Glasser Trashes Yet Another Group
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: 7 Oct 2015 01:02:22 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <d7j98uF8t3rU6@mid.individual.net>
References: <nb0xj1ws93ng.t8j97x2g3j92$.dlg@40tude.net> <d7j5obF8epoU1@mid.individual.net> <ocwj79qkk9kc$.1s2jyf9txei1l.dlg@40tude.net> <d7j849F8t3rU2@mid.individual.net> <7lyikepkfrmv$.r4gy2tce3sxw$.dlg@40tude.net> <d7j8lpF8t3rU3@mid.individual.net> <17lacvrn6umil.3nellgczi269$.dlg@40tude.net>
X-Trace: individual.net EdxHqc9Bq5mYZ3+9MQAoTAlVbM4T3/w+afzdu9LTuj+R9p7Bo/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QR/iqKygBKKo8eDKFh6m4FYk8zI=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:82124 alt.comp.freeware:245266 alt.hacker:8918 alt.privacy.anon-server:46080 comp.os.linux.advocacy:325183

On 2015-10-07, Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2015 00:52:09 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-07, Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>> On 7 Oct 2015 00:42:50 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-10-07, Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 7 Oct 2015 00:02:20 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-10-06, Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [trollish bits omitted]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> snit has managed to trash yet another USENET group. This time
>>>>>>> comp.os.linux.advocacy.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually, the record shows "Jeremy Bentham" started this thread and
>>>>>> cross posted it to comp.os.linux.advocacy as a troll:
>>>>>
>>>>> And the record also shows that anywhere snit
>>>> 
>>>> You need to blame the person who cross posted for the cross posting if
>>>> you dislike it.
>>>> 
>>>> [useless trollish bits omitted]
>>>
>>> Why?
>> 
>> Because otherwise you wouldn't be seeing it. Duh.
>> 
>>> You sound like snit.
>>> Another sock puppet?
>>> He has about a gazillion of them you know.
>> 
>> Whatever you say, buddy. I really don't give a shit. : )
>> 
>>> Groups put back so you can't hide, snit.
>> 
>> I'm not snit, and would prefer you trolls stick to the advocacy groups
>> where you belong. : )
>
> Let's put it this way. In the somewhat 10 years plus, a decade or more, the
> number of people who have supported snit is about zero.
> Really.
>
> Aside from his socks which BTW are sometimes anti-snit just to promote
> controversy and flood the group with chaff.
>
> So, seeing as that you seem to support snit and taking into account that
> over 10 years plus, ZERO PEOPLE have supported snit, what does that make
> you?
>
> No need to answer as we all know already.
>
> A SNIT SOCK PUPPET.

Whatever helps you feel better about yourself. Like I said, I don't give
a shit. Maybe you should marry him. You've had a long-term relationship
and sound very passionate about it. : )

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR