Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Date: 6 Oct 2015 17:14:58 GMT Lines: 79 Message-ID: References: <86549329f10d815d2e5922dee68cf94a@anemone.mooo.com> <210920151816339085%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210920151849448520%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020151828504734%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5tmdnY_rbLLTfY7LnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@supernews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net SGENPloZ2tDF5Bezlgx5UA1vTYo6QBbNChQeDCN0MCFB53sdol Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY= sha1:KRZuC7bxij1ZNGxEOLRBVZVRIvQ= User-Agent: NewsTap/5.0 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:81875 alt.comp.freeware:245051 alt.hacker:8788 alt.privacy.anon-server:45950 comp.os.linux.advocacy:324901 Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 10/6/15, 8:21 AM, in article mv0opk$680$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> Thats what mine does usually. I boot it into OSX only if needed (for >>>>> compiling my programs) >>>>> Under linux the speed of the machine is OK, under OSX it is a *lot* >>>>> slower >>>> >>>> Do you use it for anything other than compiling programs? In the past >>>> you have talked about being ignorant enough of OS X to not even know how >>>> to get DeskJets to work (seriously, just attach it to the same network >>>> and select it when you print). >>> >>> Idiot. >> >> The word you worked hard to make synonymous with your own name. >> >>> You can't read at all. Thats not what I said, thats what you glued up >>> mind has have you read. Your reading comprehension is non-existant since >>> you started to sniff that glue daily >> >> Oh, my mistake... it was SCANNING you could not figure out. Here, the >> proof: >> >> Peter Köhlmann, after being shown these videos: >> >> >> Both show an OfficeJet Pro 8600 after being connected to a network and >> being used for the first time on a Mac. And it works very, very well. >> ----- >> Scanning [on OS X] is not supported *at* *all* without jumping >> through several hoops. This includes hunting down 3 different >> software packages (libusb, sane-backend and sane) *and* installing >> them. Out of the box no scanning is supported at all. This is in >> stark contrast to linux where scanning is supported right from the >> start after setting up the printer >> >> The same is true about *all* OfficeJet Pro printers under OSX. >> ----- >> LOL! Yes, after being shown how an OfficeJet Pro works without doing >> *anything* extra Peter still makes these completely incorrect claims. >> >> Message-ID: l31oss$9o6$1@dont-email.me >> >> >> Sorry to say you were ignorant of printing... it was scanning you could >> not figure out. >> >>> The printer works fine. >> >> Right... it was scanning you were confused by. Because, well, you are such >> an advanced OS X user. :) >> >>> And no, I do not use the machine under OSX except for compiling programs >>> and building the install packages. And sometimes to crosscheck with a >>> clients Mac if something does not work at his site. Which happens far too >>> often with OSX when apple decides to break something with an "update" >>> >>> There is absolutely no need to boot that garbage OS from apple otherwise >>> >>> If I want to do *real* work with it (if I take it with me to a client for >>> example) it runs under linux. And it works much better and faster then >> >> So why not show some of this work you do? > > To lying imbeciles like you? The imbecile is the one who claims Macs are shit yet can't figure out how to scan in OS X. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR