Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store
Date: 6 Oct 2015 01:33:45 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <d7gmnpFj22eU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <86549329f10d815d2e5922dee68cf94a@anemone.mooo.com> <ZKSdnQgEzsIDVIzLnZ2dnUU7-TmdnZ2d@supernews.com> <041020152114099863%nospam@nospam.invalid> <upmdneeNT5qES4zLnZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <D23726C2.5EB18%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <upmdneCNT5r1R4zLnZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <D23741D4.5EBAB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <6uudnU6rVZP8YYzLnZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@supernews.com> <D2374B92.5EBC3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <wNedne2KFPInYozLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@supernews.com> <D237EFC4.5EC37%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <VJWdneRFR7_LM4_LnZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@supernews.com> <d7fq1kFbto2U4@mid.individual.net> <7Y6dnbX9lNz4SI_LnZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <D238298F.5ED4D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <yI2dncHPd6YGc4_LnZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@supernews.com> <D23846D5.5ED8D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <RdGdnVipr6lRZo_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <d7gekuFh4poU6@mid.individual.net> <4M6dnQAwqcZGg47LnZ2dnUU7-Sdi4p2d@supernews.com>
X-Trace: individual.net 98L52P024ZwIqFbToUBEegQrDFwG7vle6l3c0tmSD5mOPBYd4T
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DZ1PvIH4eUe2t/ZCh5YVI5aIfUg=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.freeware:244867 comp.sys.mac.system:81704 alt.hacker:8655 alt.privacy.anon-server:45817 comp.os.linux.advocacy:324688

On 2015-10-06, nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> wrote:
> On 2015-10-05, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Why should he bother answering your questions after you have refused to
>> answer his? At this point the discussion isn't even worth continuing, if
>> you ask me.
>
> I addressed his challenge right off the bat. Perhaps you missed it. 

This is what you said:

"That seems rather stupid, since on the desktop we're likely both
running intel processors, but have c compilers, both have a bash shell,
etc. So what would be the point?" 

That's not an answer to any of his questions.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR