Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: TotalFinder and TotalSpaces Inoperable Under 10.10.6
Date: 30 Sep 2015 15:11:45 GMT
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <d72cdhF1c59U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <2015092710555475812-xxx@yyyzzz> <mufei0$k9m$1@reader1.panix.com> <muff7c$j7a$1@dont-email.me> <d70ul2Fkr6rU3@mid.individual.net> <mug40b$d9t$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net RFbDMdu+NPB4EPVFz0cyUgVUNWEHz8KEvY0wokPpJX/+9zMnK5
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY= sha1:7bj+UfQTgkEZ9KDclyOGaRnZAY4=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.0 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:81181

FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-09-30 02:10:42 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:
> 
>> FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Are you sure it's dead?  I hear people are deciding to disable SIP, so
>>> they can run things like FinderPop and TotalFinder.
>> 
>> Risking security in the process. No thanks.
> 
> It seems to be a wash.  Aren't we risking security right now in Yosemite?
> 
> And for those who won't upgrade because one of their favorite apps 
> won't work - aren't they still risking said security by sticking with 
> Yosemite?
> 
> So, if the choice is to STAY unsecure under Yosemite, or BE unsecure 
> under El Capitan, what's the benefit?

The benefit is enhance d security, obviously.

Seems an obvious choice to me: be more secure. 

Do as you wish. I'll pick security.

-- 
Sent from my iPhone