Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: android Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:05:44 +0200 Organization: the center Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: <87vbatp409.fld@barrow.com> <290920151718375493%star@sky.net> <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net kFNs/fdJCtrnILef3fUxbwijWf2JTKMER4/19A+P9+bRS8JEi5 X-Orig-Path: here Cancel-Lock: sha1:/HveY4oBxNDd50e1alVTAfhzCpQ= User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:81155 In article <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-09-30 04:23:42 +0000, android said: > > > In article <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, > > Savageduck wrote: > > > >> On 2015-09-29 21:18:37 +0000, Davoud said: > >> > >>> android: > >>>> The people that are working towards print might find them selves with an > >>>> advantage against the competition with 24 rather than 16-20mpx... > >>> > >>> If you mean those working in print publications, I guarantee you that > >>> photo editors do not ask what the resolution of the camera was. I know > >>> this from recent sales of macrophotos from my 6MP D100. > >>> > >>>> and > >>>> remember that the higher screen resolution of today demands more and > >>>> more from the files. > >>> > >>> And I know from viewing photos on my 27" iMac 5K Retina display that a > >>> 6MP camera is up to the task of producing photos suitable for that > >>> display. > >> > >> I am still baffled that this thread continues in this NG when it is > >> best suited for rec.photo.digital. > > > > Davoud alerted me that I posted the article in the wrong group. I posted > > it on my iTab in haste... I did try to move the stuff over to RPD but, > > here we are! ;-) > > I am sure that the simple task of adding a little modification to the > headers in MT-NW would have solved the issue once you were alerted to > it. Something such as this: > "Followup-To: rec.photo.digital" That I did... ;-/ But we can talk here! :-)) > > Anyway, that is for you to decide, given that Floyd's feedback would > have been better appreciated in RPD, and it never reached those folks. > > >> Hell! Somehow android managed to get Floyd Davidson in on the > >> discussion, even though he disavows all that Apple, MS, and Adobe have > >> to offer. How he even found c.s.m.s. is a mystery. > > > > I bet that he does various kinds of undercover stuff... > >> > >> Unless he has become a closet OSX user. Hmm... > > > > That's a theory! -- teleportation kills