Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: android Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:23:42 +0200 Organization: the center Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <87vbatp409.fld@barrow.com> <290920151718375493%star@sky.net> <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net NencHFh8JlFnZISioQE9qwPnuSSGI9WKxuzzomP8+IfGLbNFHz X-Orig-Path: here Cancel-Lock: sha1:Kpc1qyGAb5D33rvyLjE7MDo82Pg= User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:81151 In article <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-09-29 21:18:37 +0000, Davoud said: > > > android: > >> The people that are working towards print might find them selves with an > >> advantage against the competition with 24 rather than 16-20mpx... > > > > If you mean those working in print publications, I guarantee you that > > photo editors do not ask what the resolution of the camera was. I know > > this from recent sales of macrophotos from my 6MP D100. > > > >> and > >> remember that the higher screen resolution of today demands more and > >> more from the files. > > > > And I know from viewing photos on my 27" iMac 5K Retina display that a > > 6MP camera is up to the task of producing photos suitable for that > > display. > > I am still baffled that this thread continues in this NG when it is > best suited for rec.photo.digital. Davoud alerted me that I posted the article in the wrong group. I posted it on my iTab in haste... I did try to move the stuff over to RPD but, here we are! ;-) > > Hell! Somehow android managed to get Floyd Davidson in on the > discussion, even though he disavows all that Apple, MS, and Adobe have > to offer. How he even found c.s.m.s. is a mystery. I bet that he does various kinds of undercover stuff... > > Unless he has become a closet OSX user. Hmm... That's a theory! -- teleportation kills