Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store
Date: 24 Sep 2015 01:15:53 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <d6h169Fk9a4U6@mid.individual.net>
References: <220920150315428842%nospam@nospam.invalid> <91777a714f0d3c05732c6cc8035a09ba@remailer.cpunk.us> <220920151252101796%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mtt2vg$gj8$1@news.albasani.net> <220920152128268439%michelle@michelle.org> <mttb7j$bf8$1@news.albasani.net> <220920152224189621%michelle@michelle.org> <mvc50bpun9li7mo0i6a7bc2ob6tpbolre7@4ax.com> <mtvdmq$i31$1@news.albasani.net> <mtve0p$qgt$1@dont-email.me> <230920152007454948%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mtvf25$qgt$6@dont-email.me> <mtvf99$rh5$8@dont-email.me> <mtvfog$qgt$12@dont-email.me> <mtvg73$vh1$5@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net GXoW+Llot3s2aSwkDg2qWg8ZZU85NGI9CzH5VBhv6ghiW4SMNf
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cmL74k7Ne/MS3hr8rpQajRSSs6I=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.freeware:243746 comp.sys.mac.system:80406 alt.hacker:8211 alt.privacy.anon-server:45352 comp.os.linux.advocacy:322580

On 2015-09-24, A.M <> wrote:
> On 2015-09-23 8:24 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> 
>> How did apple ascertain that content without invading peoples privacy?
>
> Good point.

Not really, no. Apple didn't have to do anything but verify that the DRM
included in the content being placed onto the Apple device by the user was
genuine. If it was not genuine, Apple simply prevented the content from
being placed on the Apple device. There was no need to invade anyone's
privacy. 

>> You idiots can claim your bullshit all the way you want. It is either apple 
>> invading privacy, or it is apple removing contents nilly-willy without even 
>> looking at the legal status
>> You dimbulbs can't have it both ways
>
> Ugh, I really want to ignore the insults and be nice to you. I really
> have no idea why I actually want to get along with you but I rather
> enjoy your posts even though you're a complete asshole. Either way...
> you made a good point.

Nope. Apple didn't invade anyone's privacy, nor did they remove
anything. Users lost nothing - that's a fact recorded in the lawsuit.
It's not up for dispute.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR