Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Better to wait for 10.11? Date: 13 Sep 2015 21:01:45 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <55f36b37$0$4073$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com> <55f37e97$0$56544$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com> <55f46777$0$9136$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> <1mapjey.m16z5l18z55veN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <1maozdy.s6145w7lb5a4N%nmassello@yahoo.com> X-Trace: individual.net Pqdgwcaf01bGXsk7aN8hxwLetB5y7Ka9ZL5U2F0ARWXsyKb1eB Cancel-Lock: sha1:aHkQA3+va2OsQfKVwkEtJGaRU3w= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:79854 On 2015-09-13, Neill Massello wrote: > David Empson wrote: > >> The protected directories are everything under: >> >> /bin >> /sbin >> /usr (except for /usr/local) >> /System >> /Applications/Utilities >> >> Apple-supplied applications in /Applications are also protected (e.g. >> you won't be able to modify the contents of Mail.app unless you disabled >> SIP). > > I don't quite get Apple's logic in protecting /Applications/Utilities as > a folder. If you're going to protect particular items in /Applications, > why not do the same for particular items in its Utilities subfolder > while preserving the user's ability to add non-Apple items to it? I would imagine most end users don't bother to install third-party applications in /Applications/Utilities (and most third-party installers place their applications into /Applications or ~/Applications). So what remains is Apple applications. I guess Apple wants to keep it that way. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR