Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Better to wait for 10.11? Date: 12 Sep 2015 00:26:25 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <55f36b37$0$4073$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com> <110920152015228276%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net Jsxo/TdTKG8KqCbhEL7xrAbFXBZzL6chcZLCTGm6EF7ZsNOgL0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:XB+2UHTeiX3n1Gt5Ix6EB3GyefM= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:79812 On 2015-09-12, nospam wrote: > In article , Jolly Roger > wrote: > >> > If you have some kernel extensions, going to Yosemite means you need to >> > find the doc on how to change your NVRAM to disable kernel extemsion >> > checking. >> >> Bullshit. The kernel extension this troll is mentioning is a third-party >> SSD TRIM enabler that is no longer needed since Yosemite has built-in >> support for it. > > and it's not really necessary anyway, plus it can be dangerous and > potentially cause data loss if the ssd has a buggy trim implementation, > as some popular ssds do. Yes. And many SSDs come with firmware features that effectively negates the need for TRIM support in the operating system: The JF Mezie troll has refuse to acknowledge this to this date, hopelessly stuck in the past, making false claims that TRIM is needed. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR