Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.cellular-phone-tech Subject: Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 15:55:51 -0700 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <201703291311387217-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net xm2qKicHHeOSXSVzdrGfsASb5BlmIiGn+A7Upo7ybx2wnf7hoc Cancel-Lock: sha1:xq/h2OoMXB0YvpWxeIEZvUZHh4o= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: Smokers are smarter, I say. Thread-Index: AdK7u5bFa2MHovLwf0SbhOgmpc2PzA== Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:410646 sci.physics:630153 alt.privacy.anon-server:59104 comp.sys.mac.system:105015 alt.comp.os.windows-10:40468 alt.cellular-phone-tech:1323 On 4/22/17, 2:38 PM, in article op.yy381xf2js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:15:01 +0100, Snit wrote: > >> On 4/15/17, 11:16 AM, in article octo21$n2s$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> wrote: >> >>>>> Snit is one of the dirt poor liberals that like to espouse the spending of >>>>> other people's money. >>>> >>>> Quote? >>> >>> Well, unless you are privately funding all this shit you are for, then that >>> is an entirely correct statement. >>> Get a child to read for you in the future. >> >> So no quote to back your claims of my views. Got it. You are just trolling >> for attention. >> >> Keep in mind I am the one who pushes for a STRONGER tie between hard work / >> productivity and financial gain. > > That's called "capitalism". Capitalism, without checks, is the selling of human rights and the environment to the highest bidder and directly works AGAINST those goals. With that said, pure Socialism would be no better. Having a mix of the two is not perfect but works far better than either, alone. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.