Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date	2017-04-21 20:38 -0700
Message-ID	<D5201E33.A0BAE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <op.yy2lj1gejs98qf@red.lan> <210420172017550597%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy2mxt2mjs98qf@red.lan> <210420172054342549%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy2ozfr7js98qf@red.lan>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/21/17, 6:27 PM, in article op.yy2ozfr7js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 01:54:34 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> In article <op.yy2mxt2mjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword
>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing is perfect, but you can compensate.  And you can make
>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>> colour
>>>>>>>>>>>> with only 4 inks.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> For home printing that is usually fine.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> a 4 ink printer might be suitable for 'home printing' (i.e., those
>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>> don't give a shit about quality), however, it's *impossible* for
>>>>>>>>>> 'any
>>>>>>>>>> colour' to be reproduced with only 4 inks, or any amount of inks
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> that matter.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Any colour the human eye can detect.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> absolutely wrong.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> <http://www.sant-media.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/cie.jpg>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nothing outside the CMYK line looks any different to anything inside it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> the saturated reds sure do.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then the diagram is wrong.
>>>> 
>>>> it's not
>>> 
>>> See below.
>>> 
>>>>> I can print vivid red on my printer.  I often do for bright text.
>>>> 
>>>> not as vivid as can be displayed on screen and nowhere near as vivid as
>>>> your eye can see.
>>> 
>>> Depends on the lighting in the room.
>> 
>> no.
> 
> You think the ambient light doesn't affect the colour on the paper?!

It effects the perceived color. Of course.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 00:21 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 19:36 -0400
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 01:13 +0100
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 20:17 -0400
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 01:42 +0100
              Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 20:54 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 02:27 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 21:49 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 14:48 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 20:38 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 23:41 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 20:48 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 23:58 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 21:40 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-22 10:22 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 13:25 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-22 18:33 -0400
                Colour printing etc (Was: Re: Apple told to warn ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-22 22:19 -0400
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 17:48 -0700
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:19 +0100
              Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 10:43 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:59 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 11:08 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 21:41 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-22 14:27 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:35 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-22 15:31 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-22 18:33 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:07 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:12 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-22 18:33 -0400

csiph-web