Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!testfeeder.ecngs.de!81.171.118.64.MISMATCH!peer04.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:21:03 -0700 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <86549329f10d815d2e5922dee68cf94a@anemone.mooo.com> <210920151816339085%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210920151849448520%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020151828504734%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5tmdnY_rbLLTfY7LnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@supernews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 0lSZojl6y3OiMd/g3nHQOwbgC6jQnQ4q6mK9qyWpoI5QfOWKau Cancel-Lock: sha1:g+36hKczClg0jnbhz1RljJ8T41Q= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Thread-Index: AdED7QEJ+7VJEO7PP0yV28qcwcSM1g== X-Received-Bytes: 3576 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3680630270 Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:83011 alt.comp.freeware:245987 alt.hacker:9116 alt.privacy.anon-server:46301 comp.os.linux.advocacy:326105 On 10/10/15, 11:10 PM, in article mvcugo$oc4$2@news.albasani.net, "Nobody" wrote: > On 10/6/2015 2:50 PM, Jolly Roger wrote: >> nom de plume wrote: >>> On 2015-10-06, Snit wrote: >>>>> So according to you, the mac does not use any shared libraries and has >>>>> no library dependencies at all? >>>> >>>> Not what I said at all. I said it is not an issue. I have NEVER had any >>>> problem with that on OS X nor seen a computer where anyone has. Do you have >>>> any examples? >>> >>> No, snit, and I am trying to simply get a straight answer out of you. I >>> am asking what seems like a pretty simple question. Can you get a list >>> of required dependencies. >> >> You haven't yet established that it is even necessary to list dependencies >> on OS X. > > Why would it be necessary for every type of Unix-like system except for > Mac OS X? > You have yet to establish it is necessary on every type of Unix-like system other than OS X, or if it was why it would mean OS X should share the same weakness. Do you think it is tied to the UNIX specification in some way? If so: how? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: * Mint KDE working with folders: * Mint KDE creating files: * Mint KDE help: * Mint KDE general navigation: * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: * OS / Word Processor Comparison: