Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,alt.comp.freeware,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 19:12:04 -0700 Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: <051020151258277615%nospam@nospam.invalid> <3ZSdnZTmLryQJ4_LnZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@supernews.com> <061020151503222684%nospam@nospam.invalid> <061020152226479958%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net dAczWUAD8mXXYIWKzNEBCgM/zt8DH5B5WiicKHlpTID4cxOUf4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6iVFWKmrdxVJW65l4lcvM/Twcm0= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Thread-Index: AdEDAQ5JdPeMm9C+jkiwInoP1u+e9Q== Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:82888 alt.comp.freeware:245848 comp.os.linux.advocacy:325945 On 10/9/15, 7:05 PM, in article BaudnQgvtYQf74XLnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" wrote: > On 10/09/15 14:47, Snit wrote: >> On 10/9/15, 12:20 PM, in article >> J9edna7V5vsBjoXLnZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" >> wrote: >> >>>>> Oh really. Then why does everyone in the Wayland community seem to >>>>> discount the value of remote operation? >>>> >>>> They don't. Wayland contains a component whcih provides network functions >>>> like X, and also a X emulation for standard X programs >>>> >>>>> They act like it's 1980. While >>>>> X haters have been hating on X on Linux, the "other platform" has been >>>>> adding remote access features. They even managed some positive progress >>>>> in that area. Now X style remote access is no longer considered an >>>>> obscure sort of feature. >>>> >>>> Fine. That does not detract from the fact that X as of now is already used >>>> only partially, KDE and Gnome do most of the painting themselves >>>> >>>>> Even some rubes take advantage of it. >>>>> >>>>> The times changed and caught up to Unix from 1985 and now the "kids" >>>>> want to set Linux back 20 years. >>>> >>>> You are wrong about the way Wayland works. When it is fully present you >>>> will >>>> not see much difference in linux behaviour to the current state. >>>> >>> But it should run a lot faster than just using X as it is. >> >> You will still have the same GUIs running on top. They *might* be faster... >> but really not different. >> >> > That's true. But hopefully it will be easier to program than it is > using the X11 apis. > Out of my area - but if it is it might have an impact on the KDE and GNOME teams and help them reach their shared goals. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: * Mint KDE working with folders: * Mint KDE creating files: * Mint KDE help: * Mint KDE general navigation: * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: * OS / Word Processor Comparison: