Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:58:39 -0700 Lines: 98 Message-ID: References: <86549329f10d815d2e5922dee68cf94a@anemone.mooo.com> <210920151816339085%nospam@nospam.invalid> <210920151849448520%nospam@nospam.invalid> <041020151828504734%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5tmdnY_rbLLTfY7LnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@supernews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net BSfGw1etH/n48EQjDg9zCwqezxEABbhSzZ4YG+PKSqi2h/DFJ6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:wGbPvFF1aAvSCoCaRmJp02NZ6+c= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Thread-Index: AdEAT92OKSDQ2EoHq02sCazLovHODQ== Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.freeware:245004 comp.sys.mac.system:81826 alt.hacker:8752 alt.privacy.anon-server:45915 comp.os.linux.advocacy:324850 On 10/6/15, 8:21 AM, in article mv0opk$680$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" wrote: ... >>> Thats what mine does usually. I boot it into OSX only if needed (for >>> compiling my programs) >>> Under linux the speed of the machine is OK, under OSX it is a *lot* >>> slower >> >> Do you use it for anything other than compiling programs? In the past you >> have talked about being ignorant enough of OS X to not even know how to >> get DeskJets to work (seriously, just attach it to the same network and >> select it when you print). > > Idiot. The word you worked hard to make synonymous with your own name. > You can't read at all. Thats not what I said, thats what you glued up > mind has have you read. Your reading comprehension is non-existant since you > started to sniff that glue daily Oh, my mistake... it was SCANNING you could not figure out. Here, the proof: Peter Köhlmann, after being shown these videos: Both show an OfficeJet Pro 8600 after being connected to a network and being used for the first time on a Mac. And it works very, very well. ----- Scanning [on OS X] is not supported *at* *all* without jumping through several hoops. This includes hunting down 3 different software packages (libusb, sane-backend and sane) *and* installing them. Out of the box no scanning is supported at all. This is in stark contrast to linux where scanning is supported right from the start after setting up the printer The same is true about *all* OfficeJet Pro printers under OSX. ----- LOL! Yes, after being shown how an OfficeJet Pro works without doing *anything* extra Peter still makes these completely incorrect claims. Message-ID: l31oss$9o6$1@dont-email.me Sorry to say you were ignorant of printing... it was scanning you could not figure out. > The printer works fine. Right... it was scanning you were confused by. Because, well, you are such an advanced OS X user. :) > And no, I do not use the machine under OSX except for compiling programs and > building the install packages. And sometimes to crosscheck with a clients > Mac if something does not work at his site. Which happens far too often with > OSX when apple decides to break something with an "update" > > There is absolutely no need to boot that garbage OS from apple otherwise > > If I want to do *real* work with it (if I take it with me to a client for > example) it runs under linux. And it works much better and faster then So why not show some of this work you do? Hey, why not take me up on some of the challenges and show how you would do *similar* things on Linux? * From a single online recipe (or art project, lesson plan, whatever) save it and email a PDF version where you add notes to it. Now I know this can be done on Linux; save, open, edit, email. Just curious to see how you people would generally do it and how streamlined the workflow would be. A couple ways I might: . * Make a video, as Owl and I have been, but with cursor replacement / resizing (post production), window highlighting, zooming, arbitrary area highlighting. For me these were done just to show something else: . I have many other options but picked these because they fit the real-world example I did shortly before coming up with the "challenge". * Getting a WayBackArchive page and getting images of all links, the HTML validation and CSS validation from W3.org, and a active link to the archive page, as I did here (does not have to look the exact same, of course): . In the past you ran away in deep fear. I bet we see the same thing again. :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: * Mint KDE working with folders: * Mint KDE creating files: * Mint KDE help: * Mint KDE general navigation: * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: * OS / Word Processor Comparison: