Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.graphics,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: A good free EXIF removal software for Mac OS X?
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:42:22 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <300820151142220329%michelle@michelle.org>
References: <0uKdnUKKj4iRCX3InZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <mrq4l2$5mu$2@dont-email.me> <DeOdnRDsuNnpCn3InZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082811294174414-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <KdSdne9PJO3TMH3InZ2dnUU7-bWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082812055559608-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <d4c49kFepkpU1@mid.individual.net> <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <mrr7sv$lv1$2@dont-email.me> <2015082821043955830-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <d4d2t9FlaggU1@mid.individual.net> <Z62dnb9l4eEkWHzInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <d4e2tmFt5ceU2@mid.individual.net> <201508291035417987-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <55e246af$0$46880$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> <2015082919531724115-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <slrnmu5335.1m04.g.kreme@amelia.local> <2015082922341823720-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <slrnmu66li.1p32.g.kreme@amelia.local> <2015083010151883320-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <300820151043338545%michelle@michelle.org> <d4gtupFk85rU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3c1be5667bab887f90d65c361e5ff0e7"; logging-data="8453"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PqssNazC1XVwpeoDrkGmhrXJL6bNJLpk="
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.1 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wGRXXmRX9jPytl3HXy/AODXNqLU=
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:31518 comp.sys.mac.graphics:158 comp.sys.mac.system:79223

In article <d4gtupFk85rU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger
<jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

> On 2015-08-30, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> > In article <2015083010151883320-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> > Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >> We have violent and armed criminals to deal with.
> >> > 
> >> > Yes, sadly a large number of them have badges.
> >> 
> >> On your next visit to our violent shores, perhaps I can arrange a 
> >> ride-along for you, so you can see for yourself what many Police 
> >> Departments have to deal with. I can think of three locations which 
> >> might prove to be enlightening for you, East Salinas, Santa Maria, or 
> >> Oakland, any of those on a Friday or Saturday night should work.
> >
> > I stopped reading this thread a while back because I have no interest
> > in removing EXIF data from my photos, but I happened to click on it
> > today.
> >
> > I've known more than a few LEOs over the past few decades, and I have
> > to say that there are good cops and bad cops.  The good cops far
> > outnumber the bad cops, but the fact that they are good cops means that
> > they don't do much of anything that is newsworthy, so almost all we
> > read about are the bad cops.  This gives the public a very distorted
> > view of the police.
> >
> > That's all I have to say about that.
> 
> The good cops aren't the ones citizens are complaining about. 

Of course; that's my point.