Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:02:13 +0200
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <20151014220213.241cdc45@maxa-pc>
References: <86549329f10d815d2e5922dee68cf94a@anemone.mooo.com> <mvg020151218068520%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mvgni3$nib$2@dont-email.me> <12j$20151240208562%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mvgoaj$sh3$1@dont-email.me> <D2413406.60150%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mvgrus$b4h$1@dont-email.me> <D241438B.6016E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mvgtjd$j14$1@dont-email.me> <slrnn1qb76.4kk.jedi@nomad.mishnet> <d84v5gFo6scU2@mid.individual.net> <TbKdnRzETe1sHoDLnZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> <fsdnvm930.a3p@rooftop.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net 5ZC77/xvECGuTkBpNYKMR2+kS0unorl50oYWhy4gLpDuNVchmiuiqcUT0CwJkTp+7vbL1kpzoaXgBwwHjDmTZYF2qMjiA9K8/hxuf4/9Uak+tAmwYIfxzIN7VRVUOouS
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:02:14 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="wi3YeIzL5GEqWvGkXocdzexcBjBQZaI5KPs8N6wY3VzbprNF0Nc+8c42QP/Faly6fYQOkC9AXJGdGK2vQcUgOddjI6DOcw02dtSDfvH3NUHYyRrTO527mig9i3Gnow7n"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:leiOzZFozyAwtPvZyGRTNfwq4Uc=
Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.freeware:246437 comp.sys.mac.system:83445 comp.os.linux.advocacy:326582

On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:12:25 +0000 (UTC)
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
> > On 10/13/15 12:00, Jolly Roger wrote:  
> >> On 2015-10-13, JEDIDIAH<jedi@nomad.mishnet>  wrote:  
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't even matter if Apple owns all of the code.  
> >>
> >> The only reason it's being discussed at all is because Peter hates
> >> everything Apple.
> >>  
> > I think the reason is that he can't grok Objective-C very well.
> > He complained that things aren't where they should be in the system.
> > Neither are things in the same place in Solaris.  Finding the X11
> > libs in Solaris is buried pretty deep and not
> > in /usr/libs/X11/libs.  Things like that bother him for some reason.
> >   
> 
> On my Solaris VM, X11 headers and libs are in /usr/include/X11
> and /usr/X11/lib (as symlinks to /usr/lib/*).  Those are the standard,
> expected locations afaik.
> 
> anon@solaris:~$ locate Xlib.h
> /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h
> anon@solaris:~$ locate libX11.so
> /usr/X11/lib/libX11.so
> /usr/X11/lib/libX11.so.4
> /usr/X11/lib/libX11.so.5
> /usr/X11/lib/amd64/libX11.so
> /usr/X11/lib/amd64/libX11.so.4
> /usr/X11/lib/amd64/libX11.so.5
> /usr/lib/libX11.so
> /usr/lib/libX11.so.4
> /usr/lib/libX11.so.5
> /usr/lib/amd64/libX11.so
> /usr/lib/amd64/libX11.so.4
> /usr/lib/amd64/libX11.so.5
> anon@solaris:~$ 
> 
> Contrast with debian screwball location (with no /usr/X11/lib
> symlinks): anon@lowtide:~$ locate libX11.so
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6.3.0
> anon@lowtide:~$
> 

On my Linux system it is:
/usr/lib/libX11.so
/usr/lib/libX11.so.6
/usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0
/usr/lib32/libX11.so
/usr/lib32/libX11.so.6
/usr/lib32/libX11.so.6.3.0