Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Melzzzzz Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,comp.sys.mac.system,alt.hacker,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 02:36:34 +0200 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 28 Message-ID: <20150924023634.3966bcd9@maxa-pc> References: <220920150315428842%nospam@nospam.invalid> <91777a714f0d3c05732c6cc8035a09ba@remailer.cpunk.us> <220920151252101796%nospam@nospam.invalid> <220920152128268439%michelle@michelle.org> <220920152224189621%michelle@michelle.org> <230920150841382109%michelle@michelle.org> <230920151950041296%nospam@nospam.invalid> <230920152007454989%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: news.albasani.net WmnUDkicU7gY9cq5b7iXljrrpzSwRfRbaVYhTipjni+3XcEfEgZCpEZ5K51Vep12uTn0KMR2hF5VMEFfhGMiUw== NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="wvzHA6AVSsNNCQTIA7wlueH7cCAJ49PYNt2C8LjBTwPKcapqq8kbwUN33RD9FJ9vZ30hdF+hf7nnB/AkhrS64Cr6sHtM6CGcAlHyHbgLFayV+wliiOzJ3W8/L+1wRSt9"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:G1aQukn0PXm6l5s5yxFnLPo6XKY= Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.freeware:243725 comp.sys.mac.system:80383 alt.hacker:8190 alt.privacy.anon-server:45332 comp.os.linux.advocacy:322555 On 24 Sep 2015 00:34:17 GMT Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2015-09-24, Nobody wrote: > > On 9/23/2015 7:07 PM, nospam wrote: > >> In article , Peter K=C3=B6hlmann > >> wrote: > >> > >>>> it was a crime to *not* remove it, given apple's legal > >>>> agreements with the copyright holders. > >>> > >>> That gave them the rights to invade customers privacy and even > >>> tamper with their data? > >> > >> they did no such thing. > > > > They removed content because it lacked DRM. >=20 > Actually, Apple removed files with *faked* DRM that tried (and failed) > to look like legitimate protected content - and they did so only > *after* record companies demanded it threatening to end contracts > which would hurt Apple's legitimate customers. You guys should really > try harder; you are failing spectacularly. >=20 Heh, what about pushing content on phones , then? They not only remove, but they add content as well, without user knowledge,,,