Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: dgb (David) Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system,uk.comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Mac Malware Date: 10 Mar 2024 11:27:24 GMT Lines: 71 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net /I7Rj1v0cG8VnNmS2A9GFQDYyKvv5yONv/i00YkcvwWYHdXaFy Cancel-Lock: sha1:0++aeVxILTQT6oZuEqqTX4sGjWQ= sha256:TZZoUMtpCOL0dzNVm/NhSBEF5qGYCc+0dphIx7TvL/Q= User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS X-Usenapp: v1.27.2/l - Full License Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.misc:9148 comp.sys.mac.system:143591 uk.comp.sys.mac:176683 On 9 Mar 2024 at 15:20:35 GMT, "Andy H" wrote: > On 09/03/2024 14:01, dgb (David) wrote: >> On 9 Mar 2024 at 13:17:39 GMT, "Andy H" wrote: >> >>> On 09/03/2024 10:11, dgb (David) wrote: >>>> On 9 Mar 2024 at 09:16:56 GMT, "John Hill" wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9 Mar 2024 at 08:58:08 GMT, "dgb" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm not the only person to talk about it! See ..... >>>>> >>>>> Oh, NO! Not again!! >>>>> >>>>> Serenity required. >>>> >>>> How sad, Old John. ;-( >>>> >>>> //Closed-minded people put their ego ahead of the outcome. They refrain from >>>> inquiring and instead focus on disproving others without attempting to >>>> comprehend their perspectives. They tend to become frustrated when questioned >>>> and perceive those who seek clarification as hindrances to progress. They tend >>>> to easily get angered with people who disagree.// >>>> >>>> https://fs.blog/open-closed-minded/ >>> >>> Just one response from me, to all of your postings on this matter. >>> Sometimes a comment just sparks something in me to react. >>> >>> As I see it the kind of posts you (and similar others) write here, and >>> in other places have been a contributory factor in the demise of Usenet, >>> and making groups, such as this, awful places for anyone to discuss the >>> subjects of their titles. >>> >>> The persistence of your posted subject matter just seems to indicate >>> that you are insane (and perhaps so am I for even considering a response). >>> >>> It may be misquoted from Einstein (perhaps, I can't be arsed to really >>> look that deeply, nevertheless, I trust Einstein more than anyone's >>> 'information' here). >>> >>> 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and >>> expecting different results'. >>> >>> The only thing that could be added to that is 'ad nauseum'. >>> >>> Where I stand on the security and privacy of my devices has bugger all >>> to do with you, or anyone else. I know about it, and I understand it, >>> but it's not answerable to you, or anyone else. I'm certainly not >>> 'closed-minded' about it all, just because I don't want to talk about it >>> with some guy on the Internet. >>> >>> Cheers. >> >> It seems as if I've touched a nerve! ;-) > > That information was A given. (Edited!) Could YOU be one of the 'bad guys'? >> You saw the answer I gave to Mark - why didn't you simply agree with me? > > Because I don't. > > TTFN I'm happy to chat to you whenever you wish. -- NOT just 'some guy on the Internet'! I'm David - on LinkedIn