Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage Subject: Re: Sierra's Time Machine's backups slower? Date: 28 Apr 2017 16:14:07 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <1n53swa.ty5yhv1uib5rwN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <1n53w4s.a8tohs1unrh8xN%nj_kruse@me.com> <260420171645581830%nospam@nospam.invalid> <270420170039597801%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net gkEyF6H77lwfolco1aGDdA4sQDw8JNhAyOohj9vsO/yJBqyKsV Cancel-Lock: sha1:RFZ04KIPOVB8p0bT8xk6kKTuBuI= Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:105740 comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage:1560 On 2017-04-28, android wrote: > In article , > Jolly Roger wrote: > >> Conveniently you are mum when it comes to booting from TM volumes. >> Nothing more to say on that one, eh? Thought we'd forget you said it >> wasn't possible? > > That I did not say either... You insinuated it, which is on record: On 2017-04-27, android wrote: > In article <270420170039597801%nospam@nospam.invalid>, > nospam wrote: >> In article , android >> wrote: >> >>> Nothing beats a good cloning schedule for backups. You don't have to >>> watch the 'putter while it does its things... >> >> nor do you with time machine. > > So you can boot from a TM backup? And it never fails? Run, Forest, run from your own words! ; ) Gosh... You must be tired of all this "winning" by now, you poor thing! : D -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR