Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc Subject: Re: Printer needed Date: 1 Mar 2015 18:23:41 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <0001HW.D1178423043E8928B01029BF@news.eternal-september.org> <010320151232564729%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net a0vo03XY96/DM3uu5d039AFD+lMk9C5rlAet0T+nbabw2U6ztK Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ku7cV7fG0H4427hXMhrUxwCE1t4= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc:1631 On 2015-03-01, nospam wrote: > In article , tmo1138 > wrote: > >> >> My next printer will probably be from Canon, since I do a lot of photography. > > if you do a lot of photography, then you should get an epson printer. > the results will be much better than anything canon could ever do. some > of canon's photo printers don't even do cmyk, they're cmy. that's bad. Meh. I get terrific photo prints out of my Canon iX6520. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR