Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.graphics,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: A good free EXIF removal software for Mac OS X? Date: 31 Aug 2015 01:25:42 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <0uKdnUKKj4iRCX3InZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082812055559608-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082821043955830-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <201508291035417987-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <55e246af$0$46880$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> <2015082919531724115-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082922341823720-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015083010151883320-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015083016520358689-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015083018144872615-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net r+hRxCWi/ajdMAciZe2P+AZ73MiKZ4i3loU6VtweeYG/OSjjzq Cancel-Lock: sha1:kkDuw7wsSMsxwnQHPr2GLYTAugw= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:31557 comp.sys.mac.graphics:188 comp.sys.mac.system:79262 On 2015-08-31, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-08-31 00:56:37 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> On 2015-08-30, Savageduck wrote: >>> On 2015-08-30 22:25:08 +0000, dorayme said: >>> >>>> In article <2015083010151883320-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, >>>> Savageduck wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-30 14:59:19 +0000, Lewis >>>>> said: >>>>> >>>> ... his usual bullshit... >>>> >>>>> On your next visit to our violent shores, perhaps I can arrange a >>>>> ride-along for you, so you can see for yourself what many Police >>>>> Departments have to deal with. I can think of three locations which >>>>> might prove to be enlightening for you, East Salinas, Santa Maria, or >>>>> Oakland, any of those on a Friday or Saturday night should work. >>>> >>>> The thing that strikes me about the people who shotgun blame all >>>> police and others for the sins of the few, is their unworldliness, >>>> their lack of actual experience or realisation of what police have to >>>> confront on a regular basis, most dealing with it with admirable >>>> restraint and sensitivity. These people also usually are bad at >>>> statistics, they manufacture them in their addled brains, they jumble >>>> everything up, mix their facts with fiction and produce turds. >>> >>> Unfortunately they have no idea of what the regular patrol/beat cop >>> experiences. >> >> Bullshit, and I don't have to walk in your shoes to know you shouldn't >> kill or abuse the rights of an innocent civilian. Again, citizens aren't >> upset with good cops. But the good cops that sit by and allow their >> fellow boy in blue bad cops to kill and abuse citizens are partially >> responsible, as is the system and organizations that support them. And >> citizens can and will let it be known that the abuse is not acceptable >> until real change is made to prevent it. > > How innocent was this civilian? > Are you of the opinion it's okay for cops to kill innocent people because some people are not innocent? Do you have any idea how fucking stupid a statement that would be to make? Maybe we should hope that you're the next cop-abused innocent civilian, so you learn a little lesson. It is the fucking *job* of a police officer to enforce the law and protect and serve the citizens of this country. If cops start abusing citizens because they dislike their jobs, it's time for them to look for another profession. We pay them to put themselves in harms way because we want protection from those citizens that would harm us - not because we want the cops to treat *all* of us like them. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR