Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Helpful Harry Newsgroups: comp.databases.filemaker,comp.sys.mac.databases Subject: Re: Which FMP version does work on which MacOS Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:17:03 +1300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 36 Message-ID: <221020150917035772%HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: LSIQAI487OUHQ7B+1bqaFQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.4 (Carbon/OS X) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Face: vIZzK[X\z-._]-_:U?l@cBtwg<{a>ggn\mH}Vs>38E,#R%7h%U0'=4;1Q=erO %[T#a{YJfGvAbWmE@f_h], Martin ?rautmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I just learned that FMP9 does not work on El Capitan, MacOS 10.11 > > Is there any reliable info around which does still work where? > > I do find e.g. > > rlier-versions,-os-x-mavericks-compatibility> > > which claims that FMP 10 and FMP 11 are not compatible with MacOS 10.9 > > MacOS 10.9 (Mavericks) does work with FMP from 12.05 upwards... > > No Info on FMP 13 and MacOS 10.11, but FMP 14.03 should work fine. > > FMP 13 should work from 13.04 on with MacOS 10.10 (Yosemite) > ... so far the filemaker.com info > > Rosetta and Java SE 6 seem to be the bottlenecks!? > > > Personally, I do use FMP11 on MacOS 10.10, which does work very well. > There are just some limitations due to the gone Rosetta, such as no more > .xls export. It's no use to you, but for the sake of completion, I know FileMaker 4.1 has an annoying issue when running under Classic in Mac OS X 10.1 and 10.2 - in Layout mode dragging a field or object to a new position will duplicate it instead of just move it. Helpful Harry :o)