Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: What "forms" of 2FA is Apple requiring for all new Apple IDs?
Date: 4 Sep 2024 15:15:12 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <ljrbs0FjflU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <vb4o37$2f2k$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vb4q0k$21bpi$1@solani.org> <vb5126$2ub27$2@dont-email.me> <vb5cut$30p45$1@dont-email.me> <ljov1rFfhr7U4@mid.individual.net> <vb7qt9$31hr$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ljpvu8Fkb6sU3@mid.individual.net> <vb8q69$1sag$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vb8qin$3n89i$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net mX+VVoKK1pnL+NyomYg2Kw/Cyfdn89k55kfzI5ikw3x2TeJakS
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nE3hic/+U+PXyGKm30tu2FsEmt4= sha256:uNETtHvFUaY3FL8AHzQK47e9CYTHfT1ORCS2laut/Tw=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com misc.phone.mobile.iphone:189766 comp.sys.mac.system:144763 comp.mobile.ipad:76405 comp.sys.mac.apps:47298 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:134432 alt.privacy:29435

On 2024-09-04, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2024-09-03 22:11, Andrew wrote:
>> Jolly Roger wrote on 4 Sep 2024 02:45:28 GMT :
>> 
>>> Nothing you have said proves your implied assumption that 2FA is
>>> undesirable.
>> 
>> How is being forced to carry your Android phone with you for the rest
>> of your life just so that you can log into your Apple ID, desirable?
>
> That is in no way a description of what is required.

He knows that. He's trolling. The truth is you only need 2FA the *first*
time you sign in on a *new* device. After that, the device is trusted.
And he still hasn't proven his assumed claim that 2FA is supposedly
undesirable or supposedly violates your privacy - both ludicrous claims
on their face. And BGM will claim *we* are the "real trolls" for
pointing these things out, because "success" to BGM and Arlen is lying
without ever being questioned or corrected.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR