Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: What "forms" of 2FA is Apple requiring for all new Apple IDs?
Date: 4 Sep 2024 02:45:28 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <ljpvu8Fkb6sU3@mid.individual.net>
References: <vb4o37$2f2k$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vb4q0k$21bpi$1@solani.org> <vb5126$2ub27$2@dont-email.me> <vb5cut$30p45$1@dont-email.me> <ljov1rFfhr7U4@mid.individual.net> <vb7qt9$31hr$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
X-Trace: individual.net U91MYAtXmcrryHphLfakjQcGNiLsQ8WHihHnA94Z8ulhua6WwH
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p44pZH0yLDRYeRGp1Yle2HZUrGo= sha256:dMLyp9NtTFVFtJfulV2/YIcWI3f6xmWl7zdYoOm3fy8=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com misc.phone.mobile.iphone:189758 comp.sys.mac.system:144749 comp.mobile.ipad:76400 comp.sys.mac.apps:47293 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:134427 alt.privacy:29430

On 2024-09-03, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote on 3 Sep 2024 17:24:11 GMT :
>
>>> Google controls its operating system just as Apple controls its OS.
>>> And Google is not requiring MFV for use of their Android operating system.
>> 
>> Your entire argument is based on a false narrative that 2FA is
>> undesirable.
>
> Facts.

Nothing you have said proves your implied assumption that 2FA is
undesirable.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR