Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: spell"checkers" Date: 30 Apr 2016 20:27:43 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <1mm9hqf.5tcis3ggig07N%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <5ZSdnawzPq08soPKnZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@posted.sonicnet> <1mmij4q.1w39sfoyfj3jwN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> X-Trace: individual.net P6x5Th73SdYWu9WxGvf9EQvJEQ5woFqqda1C19DqbMhMl0EGCF Cancel-Lock: sha1:5/DbB/kK2F/azEenZomYH2oPkys= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:35568 On 2016-04-30, Erilar wrote: > Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >> dorayme wrote: >> >>> In article <5ZSdnawzPq08soPKnZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@posted.sonicnet>, >>> Patty Winter wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> In article , >>>> Lewis wrote: >>>>> >>>>> She is creating documents in pages and then TAKING SCREENSHOTS of the >>>>> documents to create he final "document" >>>> >>>> Is that true? No wonder she's capturing the red squiggles. >>> >>> Always go for the theory that makes people (you have no good reason to >>> gang up on and demean) as stupid-as-possible. But that is the culture >>> of so many of you here. >> >> I'd love to know how else one gets the red underlining from the >> spellcheck into a printed document. > > I wasn't printing it. I was exporting to the iPad Pages to see what it > looked like on the iPad. Then you shouldn't have claimed you were printing it... -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR