Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: spell"checkers" Date: 25 Apr 2016 23:49:31 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <571e87c5$0$44942$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <250420161935490528%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net t1g6kDacMg0TY+2XTbQxjQUYU2SSs8qmvZHEogqNox3EegUTBH Cancel-Lock: sha1:XUU8hA48/L5fxeXwXjeeEJsbBkY= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:35459 On 2016-04-25, nospam wrote: > In article , Jolly Roger > wrote: > >> >>A: whether from camera or iPad, I usually open and trim fotos with >> > >> > What's with the spelling affectation on "photos"? >> >> I've wondered that too. Maybe she just thinks it's "cool" or something. > > it worked for fotomat. > > Never heard of them. So did it really work? Maybe that's debatable. ; ) Anyhow, I don't really care what spelling she uses, no matter how silly. It's pretty clear she means "photos". : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR