Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Why no pan binary for OSX?? Date: 17 Mar 2016 15:55:12 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <1055763160.479910793.185813.lloydp21-live.com@news.individual.net> <1006683346.479921879.730345.lloydp21-live.com@news.individual.net> X-Trace: individual.net ZDwcfcq/LyqW9AjeDj//gQbZVNr9Edw7Vo4NsJGX1DoSYb2d4B Cancel-Lock: sha1:ihI/sFPBQR5i3/7zRN2gp4LAk0c= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:34842 On 2016-03-17, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2016-03-17, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> Lewis wrote: >>>> In message >>>> Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>> Binaries are available for pan for almost every other platform it is >>>>> available for, but none for OSX. I'd love to have pan for my MacBook >>>>> 12" but don't want to diddle with compiling it myself. >>>> >>>> Its trivial to compile. >>>> >>>> % git clone git://git.gnome.org/pan2 >>>> % cd pan2 >>>> % ./autogen.sh; make >>>> >>> Those were on the tip of my tongue, so obvious, right? :) >>> >>> And to do it that way I suppose I didn't need to add anything else to my MB >>> install? >>> >>> Nope, on both counts. But thanks anyway. >> >> You certainly do not need the extra overhead of macports. > > So what do you use if not Xcode and MacPorts? Please pay attention. I didn't say Xcode is not required. Naturally, you can't compile without a compiler, which is what Xcode provides. Again, MacPorts is not needed. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR