Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.graphics,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: A good free EXIF removal software for Mac OS X? Date: 30 Aug 2015 01:38:48 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 89 Message-ID: References: <0uKdnUKKj4iRCX3InZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082811294174414-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082812055559608-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082821043955830-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <201508291035417987-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <55e246af$0$46880$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net HQOLtCIQQGr/vaSd0yi1gQV4WmYYICFHbNszirzMcqWpOieWU0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:yzQ3/dOBjeWzYnxnOTdn5z33Rr4= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:31443 comp.sys.mac.graphics:114 comp.sys.mac.system:79162 On 2015-08-30, Don Bruder wrote: > In article <55e246af$0$46880$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com>, > Warren Oates wrote: > >> In article <201508291035417987-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, >> Savageduck wrote: >> >> > On 2015-08-29 15:54:30 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >> > >> > > On 2015-08-29, Alan Browne wrote: >> > >> On 2015-08-29 02:48, Jolly Roger wrote: >> > >>> On 2015-08-29, Savageduck wrote: >> > >>>> On 2015-08-29 03:13:13 +0000, Don Bruder said: >> > >>>>> In article <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, >> > >>>>> Savageduck wrote: >> > >>>>>> On 2015-08-28 22:05:40 +0000, Jolly Roger >> > >>>>>> said: >> > >>>>>>> On 2015-08-28, Savageduck wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Aah! So you are using stolen equipment. >> > >>>>>>>> I can understand your reluctance to reveal that. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Last I checked the desire for privacy isn't an indication of >> > >>>>>>> malfeasance. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Ant is naturally paranoid, I am naturally skeptical and suspicious, >> > >>>>>> it >> > >>>>>> was part of my job description. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> I note your use of the past tense. You have my condolences for your >> > >>>>> former affliction, and my hopes for a rapid recovery. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> After 25 years, in a California Law enforcement agency... >> > >>> >> > >>> The fact that you worked in American law enforcement certainly explains >> > >>> your willingness to accuse otherwise innocent people of wrongdoing. You >> > >>> have zero evidence that Ant has stolen anything at all, yet you accuse >> > >>> him of being a thief. You do this because you can get away with it, and >> > >>> it wouldn't surprise me if you've done so on the job, where you had >> > >>> even >> > >>> more power at your fingertips. Again, the desire for privacy isn't an >> > >>> indication of malfeasance. There is absolutely nothing wrong with >> > >>> American citizens removing their own private information from EXIF >> > >>> entries in images. You are a shining example of what is wrong with the >> > >>> mindset of American police forces. Personally I'm glad you are retired. >> > >>> Good riddance. >> > >> >> > >> A bit harsh JR. Savageduck's statement was kneejerk and not though out. >> > >> But that's all. It happens in NG's from time to time. Recall the >> > >> great mindless May of 2003. Hope that never happens again. >> > > >> > > Hardly. Police forces across the country killing innocent American >> > > citizens in record numbers due to the very same mind set and associated >> > > knee jerk reactions is harsh. >> > >> > Damn! Twenty five years and I never managed to kill any American >> > citizens, not even guilty ones. >> >> My two favourite words in the English language: Officer Down. >> >> officer down >> officer down >> lookit its guts spilt out on the ground >> lookit its brain matter spattert around >> rejoice >> rejoice >> there's an officer down >> >> >> and fuck you. > > Interesting how such a comparatively small sample of the general > population - A sample I assume (without any way to verify) assembled > from all across the nation, not to mention possibly the world, and > presumably of decent education - has such similar (and strong! - Good > grief, Warren, that's a nasty hate you've got on for 'em - not that I > can blame you much, but... WOW!) views of the cops. If it happens to just one of us, it happens to *all* of us. If citizens sit idly by allowing this to happen, they don't deserve the freedom they have. Those who would subvert and destroy the freedoms of American citizens MUST be squelched, or this great experiment is a failure. And rest assured, it *will* be squelched before it's over. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR