Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.graphics,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: A good free EXIF removal software for Mac OS X? Date: 29 Aug 2015 17:46:46 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: <0uKdnUKKj4iRCX3InZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2015082811294174414-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082812055559608-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015082821043955830-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <201508291035417987-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net 20P8M975eKwqUi9FpNmd5g1vpW08ZzLVQoTQFQS+mweARp4Nc0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:wdMxZMuRYhhlL3P66h8j3hEljXo= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.apps:31419 comp.sys.mac.graphics:101 comp.sys.mac.system:79123 On 2015-08-29, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-08-29 15:54:30 +0000, Jolly Roger said: > >> On 2015-08-29, Alan Browne wrote: >>> On 2015-08-29 02:48, Jolly Roger wrote: >>>> On 2015-08-29, Savageduck wrote: >>>>> On 2015-08-29 03:13:13 +0000, Don Bruder said: >>>>>> In article <2015082816522715023-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, >>>>>> Savageduck wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-08-28 22:05:40 +0000, Jolly Roger said: >>>>>>>> On 2015-08-28, Savageduck wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Aah! So you are using stolen equipment. >>>>>>>>> I can understand your reluctance to reveal that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Last I checked the desire for privacy isn't an indication of >>>>>>>> malfeasance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ant is naturally paranoid, I am naturally skeptical and suspicious, it >>>>>>> was part of my job description. >>>>>> >>>>>> I note your use of the past tense. You have my condolences for your >>>>>> former affliction, and my hopes for a rapid recovery. >>>>> >>>>> After 25 years, in a California Law enforcement agency... >>>> >>>> The fact that you worked in American law enforcement certainly explains >>>> your willingness to accuse otherwise innocent people of wrongdoing. You >>>> have zero evidence that Ant has stolen anything at all, yet you accuse >>>> him of being a thief. You do this because you can get away with it, and >>>> it wouldn't surprise me if you've done so on the job, where you had even >>>> more power at your fingertips. Again, the desire for privacy isn't an >>>> indication of malfeasance. There is absolutely nothing wrong with >>>> American citizens removing their own private information from EXIF >>>> entries in images. You are a shining example of what is wrong with the >>>> mindset of American police forces. Personally I'm glad you are retired. >>>> Good riddance. >>> >>> A bit harsh JR. Savageduck's statement was kneejerk and not though out. >>> But that's all. It happens in NG's from time to time. Recall the >>> great mindless May of 2003. Hope that never happens again. >> >> Hardly. Police forces across the country killing innocent American >> citizens in record numbers due to the very same mind set and associated >> knee jerk reactions is harsh. > > Damn! Twenty five years and I never managed to kill any American > citizens, not even guilty ones. While I can appreciate that, I'm not praising you for it. And the phrase I should have used it "abused" rather than "killed" since that's more accurate and covers abuses that don't end in death. There are *plenty* of other ways to step on the rights of citizens that don't necessarily end up in death of a citizen. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR